Pelavin: "This decision is the second within a week that has solidified strong legal protections for those who are victims of sexual harassment."
Contact: Kate Bigam or Jessica Weiser
202.387.2800 | email@example.com
WASHINGTON, D.C., January 26, 2008 - In response to todays Supreme Court decision in Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville, Mark Pelavin, associate director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, issued the following statement:
The Supreme Courts unanimous decision today in Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville reaffirms our nations commitment to protecting victims of workplace sexual harassment. This decision is the second within a week (following Along Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee) that has solidified strong legal protections for those who are victims of sexual harassment.
The Crawford decision, which prohibits the firing of individuals who provide evidence in an internal sexual harassment investigation, but do not themselves initiate a sexual harassment complaint, acknowledges that sexual harassment remains an insidious and persistent problem in the workplace. It ensures that employees will not risk their jobs if they divulge potentially incriminating evidence concerning a colleague who is being investigated for sexually inappropriate behavior.
The Union for Reform Judaism was proud to join an amicus brief in this case coordinated by the National Womens Law Center. The brief highlighted the pervasiveness of sexual harassment and its detrimental effect on womens abilities to participate fully in the workplace. It also argued, and the Court agreed, that the anti-retaliation provisions of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act protect from dismissal workers who participate in internal sexual-harassment cases. We are pleased that this standard has been upheld and that the Court has again made clear that sexual harassment has no place in the American workforce.